![]() ![]() Here’s the old, pre-R 18+ games guidelines which were combined with film guidelines into a single document: Here’s the current games classification guidelines: That said, the Wiki article does tend to simplify by stating the more conservative of the two.īy “sexualised violence” do you mean sexual violence? regarding “violence” – R for films simply states “violence is permitted, sexual violence may be implied, if justified by context” – R for games still has extra constraints on the allowable impact of violence alone: “High impact violence that is, in context, frequently gratuitous, exploitative and offensive to a reasonable adult will not be permitted.”). borderline RC – which meant DLC could be potentially push it over the line (and because DLC was often never submitted for classification, the end result would be a game that no longer fit into the MA category.)Īnd the wikipedia page is a little misleading – the legislation for classification of film and computer games are still separate, and have different limitations towards the top-end (eg. ![]() But those games that were “slightly edited” would almost always end up at the top end of the MA rating – ie. And I’ve got no problem with anything getting moved up where deserved (and Gears was most certainly deserved). I agree that a lot of people think it was a major problem because it was widespread, however imo it was a major problem because it was happening at all. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |